MAYBERRY INTELLIGENCEConference contextSchool insightsRankings · Predictions · Championship outlook
Mayberry AnalysisWomen's Volleyball

Anderson 3, Fairmont State 2: Reeves ends a late scare after a commanding start

Mayberry Sports Intelligence

WOMEN’S VOLLEYBALL · AUGUST 28, 2026 · RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS

Executive brief

Anderson’s 25–13 and 25–11 opening sets suggested early control, but Fairmont State forced a fifth by winning 25–18 and 26–24. The Trojans eventually prevailed 15–13, after a comfortable lead in the decider narrowed sharply. [1]

Official results — event profile

MeasureAndersonFairmont State
Set 12513
Set 22511
Set 31825
Set 42426
Set 51513
Kills7253
Hitting percentage.224.135
Digs113102

Published results. [1]

Decisive passage

A six-point run took Anderson from 5–4 to 11–4 in the fifth. The Trojans later reached 14–8, but Fairmont scored five straight to make it 14–13. Ava Reeves then put away Ellie Nieporte’s set to end the match. The closing rally stopped a run that had included four Anderson attack errors and a Fairmont kill. [1]

Player impact

Mikaylah Hedlund led Anderson with 21 kills, Emily Campbell added 17 and Reeves 16. Nieporte supplied 63 assists and 20 digs. Jamie Juhnevicz recorded 37 digs. The Trojans hit .469 and .371 in the first two sets, before dropping to .119 and .123 in the next two. [1]

Mayberry’s take

Anderson had the greater attacking volume and a substantial full-match efficiency edge. The set-by-set view explains why those advantages still led to a close finish: the opening dominance was followed by much less efficient periods. Reeves’ final point secured the result, while the preceding five-rally lapse provides a concrete sequence to review rather than a reason to disregard an otherwise productive attack.

Conference context

This was nonconference competition. The result contributes to the team’s early-season record and evaluation, without changing its SAC win-loss record. The useful next comparison is whether the strengths and weaknesses visible here recur against subsequent opponents.

Evidence scope

Analysis uses the official box score and rally log. Statistical differences describe the match; they do not establish unreported tactical instructions, injuries or player psychology.